Comparing Similar Texts Resource Pages
Pages in this section: 1 | 2 | 3 |
4 | 5 |
What Does It Mean?
After you have underlined your synopsis with colored pencils, or used
other tools to compare Matthew, Mark and Luke closely, gather your data and analyze it. Basically here, you are
looking for similarities between texts, and differences between them, and asking, "What does it all mean?"
| Describe what you see: |
- What are the clearest points of agreement between different
accounts of the same story?
- What is distinctive about each gospel's account?
|
| Decide what it means: |
- What have you learned about the particular story told by the
text you are studying?
- What do you want to know more about?
|
Describe
What You See
Look at what you have underlined in the synopsis. You will probably
have lots of data that is not all that significant, unless you are
trying to make an argument related to sources behind the gospels, or
certain other highly specialized academic questions. In other words,
for most standard exegetical study of the gospels, it doesn't matter
a great deal that only Matthew and Mark describe the mustard seed as "the
smallest of all seeds," while that phrase is missing from Luke.
You will have a lot of data when you have finished underlining a pericope.
How do you sort through it? Here are two questions to help you.
1. What are the clearest points of agreement between different
accounts of the same story?
Usually, the gospel writers have different ways of beginning and ending
a story, but in the middle, they will often have strikingly similar
wording. In this step, you look for those phrases and sentences that
agree with each other across gospels. Points of agreement between the
texts may give us a window on parts of the oral tradition that were
fairly well set by the time the gospel writers were composing their
books.
In this step, you will also look for similar details about the setting
of a story, as well as similar words or phrases. Do the gospel writers
agree, for instance, about the audience to whom a certain saying is
addressed, or the place where a certain event happens?
2. What is distinctive about each gospel's account?
Difference in the New Testament
I believe that our reading of scripture is richer when we are able
to hear the distinct voice of each author of scripture, rather than
blending all the voices together. This is a judgment call, of course.
Some readers find that my way of reading elevates differences in scripture
above agreements within the scriptural witness.
Yet I remain convinced that the New Testament has more to say to us
if we do not smush together (that's a technical term) all the different
texts it contains. The activities in Into the New Testament will often
direct your eye to distinctive elements in the texts you are reading.
In this step, you look closely at differences between the gospels
you have compared. If the evangelists are telling the story differently,
what are those differences? Maybe in one gospel the crowds are addressed,
while in another, Jesus is talking only to the disciples. Or, as in
pericope no. 254, in one gospel, it is "a man" who asks Jesus
a question (Mark 10:17), while in another it is "a ruler" (Luke
18:18). The goal of this step is to listen for how each evangelist's
voice is present as each one tells a similar story.
Decide
What It Means
By now you have sorted your findings into things that are the same
across the gospels and things that are different. What does it all
mean? Here are two questions that may help you think about the significance
of the things you have noticed.
1. What have you learned about the particular story of the text
you are studying?
Let's say you are studying Luke's story of the man who comes to Jesus
and asks, "What shall I do to inherit eternal life?" (Luke
18:18-23; pericope no. 254). Particular to Luke's witness is that the
man is a ruler. Neither Matthew nor Luke describe him this way. Also,
only Luke leaves the man in the story for the next scene in the gospel.
Matthew and Mark both say, "he went away sorrowful..." but
in Luke, Jesus continues to talk to him in the next pericope (see Luke
18:24-30; pericope no. 255). Details like these help you to interpret
the story, as Luke tells it, rather than as it is in a blending of
all three accounts.
2. What do you want to know more about?
Your synopsis study may highlight additional questions to ask. For
instance, since Luke calls the man a ruler, you might want to know
whether rulers are mentioned elsewhere in Luke. You could find out
by completing a word study on
the word Luke uses to describe the man. Luke also calls the man "very
rich," rather than saying he had "great possessions." You
might find out more about this man if you look at other places where
Luke describes people as rich or very rich. Again, a concordance and
the skill to complete a word study will help here.
Objectives of Comparing the Synoptic Gospels
Remember that overall, the objectives of synoptic underlining, as
I use it here, are:
- to identify the voice and particular emphases of each gospel writer,
and
- to discover questions you would like to follow up on as you continue
to study a text.
With these objectives in mind, try one of the problems related to Comparing Similar texts on the activity grid.
|